Stephen Arrivello, ExCorde Capital. PEA welcomes guest bloggers to submit articles related to C-PACE. PEA thanks Stephen for submitting this piece.
The Philadelphia C-PACE Program recently revised financing rules, enabling property owners to apply for retroactive funds as far as three years after project completion.
Under the existing retroactive financing rule, owners could extract capital from completed projects within a maximum two-year window.
It may sound like a technical tweak, but the impact is immediate. Extending the retroactive window makes it far easier for commercial property owners to lower debt, stabilize operations, and reinforce the long-term strength of their buildings.
Retroactive financing is worth owners’ consideration – especially in today’s capital market of high rates and tight lending.
Why a Three-Year Retroactive Window Is a Game Changer
Under the new rule, owners can more likely tap C-PACE at exactly the moment they need long-term, fixed-rate capital. Project stabilization simply takes longer today than under previous market conditions. Commercial projects often face:
- Slower lease-ups
- Construction delays
- Budget overruns
- Softer cash-flow ramp-ups
In many instances, the two-year lookback period expired just as buildings were turning the corner. The three-year rule better fits the realities of today’s commercial real estate market.
Afterall, it’s useful to recall the differences in the lending market three years ago compared to today. Many owners who began construction in 2021–2022 finished those projects in a dramatically different financial environment:
- Interest rates nearly tripled
- Senior lenders tightened loan-to-value (LTV) ratios
- Construction costs jumped 25–40 percent
Retroactive C-PACE financing helps owners address these challenges. By refinancing on projects with qualifying energy-efficiency or resilience improvements, owners can offset construction overruns, reduce high-cost capital, improve their debt-service-coverage ratio (DSCR), and generally do better at avoiding financial distress.
What This Update Means for Property Owners
The longer lookback period can be especially useful across a wide pipeline of recently completed projects: multifamily, mixed-use, hospitality, industrial, office repositionings, and more. Hundreds of buildings that missed the old deadline may now qualify.
C-PACE typically offers long-term, fixed-rate, non-recourse financing. Swapping out double-digit bridge, mezzanine, or preferred-equity capital for ~6–8 percent C-PACE financing can significantly improve project economics.
With many construction loans coming due, and lenders hesitant to refinance at previous values, owners need new capital options. Retroactive C-PACE can be used to:
- Pay down senior debt
- Reduce lender risk
- Improve DSCR
- Extend holding periods
- Prevent capital calls or forced sales
Owners who self-funded building improvements can also benefit. C-PACE is an option to refinance their equity and return capital to the balance sheet. Refinancing creates liquidity for new projects or presents an opportunity to stabilize the existing portfolio.
C-PACE financing can be applied toward a wide range of high-cost systems and materials ranging from the building envelope and roofing to heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) equipment.
The Bottom Line
Extending retroactive C-PACE financing to three years is a targeted, pro-growth change that gives Philadelphia property owners meaningful flexibility in a difficult capital market. Now is the time for building owners to revisit eligibility and to assess whether retroactive C-PACE can strengthen their refinancing or recapitalization strategy.
The revised retroactive financing rule opens the door for hundreds of recently completed projects to shore up their capital stacks and to reduce operating pressure. And, if the additional capital flow enables owners to invest in more C-PACE-financed developments, the revision will result in: reduced energy consumption, fewer carbon emissions, better-quality buildings, lower risk of distressed or undercapitalized assets, and more stable, tax-paying properties across the city. That’s a win for owners, lenders, the City of Philadelphia, and all residents.


